Transformation 4.0: Why Strategy Execution Is Entering a New Era

Over the past decade, many industries have gone through a fundamental shift in how work gets done.

Industry 4.0 reframed manufacturing — not as a set of isolated processes, but as a connected system powered by data, automation, and real-time insight. It was not just about doing the same work faster. It was about building the capability to adapt continuously.

Transformation is going through a similar shift.

This is Transformation 4.0 and it fundamentally changes how strategy gets executed and how value gets created.

Rethinking What “Good at Transformation” Really Means

Most organizations invest significant time, energy, and capital into transformation.

They create roadmaps. Build dashboards. Establish governance forums. Stand up Transformation Offices. They deliver programs, implement systems, and at times declare success.

But do most organizations truly believe they are good at transformation?

In reality, many Transformation Offices are created precisely because the organization is not transforming fast enough, consistently enough, or with sufficient impact. The only constant is change —yet the ability to manage change as a core organizational capability often remains underdeveloped.

Chief Transformation Officers, EPMO leaders, and operating partners frequently express the same frustration:

“We’re doing a lot, but we’re not consistently getting the value we expected.”

What sits beneath that statement is not a lack of ambition, talent, or investment.
It is a lack of execution maturity — across people, processes, and tools — to reliably deliver what was promised and to see risk early enough to intervene.

That tension is not accidental.
It is a signal that transformation itself has changed, and many organizations have not changed with it.

‍

Transformation Didn’t Fail. It Evolved.

When I first encountered “transformation” at university, it went by a different name: Business Process Reengineering.

It was analytical, internally focused, and efficiency-driven

• Map the process
• Implement the system
• Remove cost

This was Transformation 1.0 — an era defined by standardization, control, and operational efficiency.

It worked for a time. But efficiency alone does not create advantage.
It simply allows organizations to keep up.

‍

From Change Programs to Outputs

As globalization, digital technologies, and the internet reshaped markets, transformation evolved again.

Organizations could no longer rely on doing the same things more efficiently. They needed to do different things — faster, at scale, and across increasingly complex operating models.

“Business Transformation” replaced BPR. Programs became larger, more visible, and more strategic. Transformation Offices emerged to coordinate delivery across the enterprise.

This was Transformation 2.0 — the age of programs.

The focus shifted to outputs:

• Milestones delivered
• Timelines met
• Dashboards staying green

But something subtle happened.

Transformation became synonymous with activity.

Initiatives multiplied. Governance expanded. Reporting improved.
Yet outcomes were often assumed rather than proven — and value was frequently discovered too late to influence decisions.

‍

The Shift to Outcomes - and Its Limits

Pressure from boards, investors, and markets drove the next evolution.

Transformation was no longer just about change. It had to deliver measurable outcomes:

• Cost optimization
• EBITDA uplift
• Revenue growth
• Synergies from M&A

Benefits realization frameworks emerged. Business cases became more rigorous. Value was named, quantified, and tracked.

This was Transformation 3.0 — the shift from outputs to outcomes.

And yet, in many organizations, value remained something that was planned but not actively managed.

Delivery teams delivered initiatives.  Finance attempted to track benefits.
Somewhere in between, accountability blurred.

‍

The Next Wave of Transformation

We are now entering Transformation 4.0.

This era is defined by a simple truth:

Value is not created by projects. It is created by decisions — made continuously, across a connected system.

Transformation 4.0 moves beyond outcomes alone. It is about rigorous, disciplined execution that operates as part of business as usual.

In this next wave:

• Strategy, execution, and value are inseparable
• Cost optimization and growth are managed together, not treated as competing agendas
• Transformation is no longer episodic — it becomes an operating capability

Value is viewed holistically:

• Top-line growth (organic and inorganic)
• Bottom-line performance (EBITDA)
• Cost and revenue synergies
• Strategic focus and optionality

For Transformation Offices and EPMOs, this represents a fundamental shift in role — from coordinating change to enabling continuous, value-led execution across the enterprise or portfolio.

‍

Where Strategy, Execution, and Value Converge

In Transformation 4.0, strategy, execution, and value can no longer be treated as separate disciplines.

They operate as a single system.

The organizations that consistently create value are not doing more transformation — they are doing it differently. They focus on the right work, not just more work. They manage portfolios, trade-offs, and capacity deliberately. And they use timely insight to surface risk and value early enough to intervene.

Most importantly, they understand where they truly sit on the maturity curve — across people, processes, and tools — and they build capability intentionally over time.

This is especially critical in PE-backed and capital-constrained environments, where execution discipline, value realization, and speed of learning directly impact returns.

If you’re leading transformation, strategy execution or value creation through benefits realization, this series is designed to provoke reflection and conversation.

Over the coming weeks, I’ll be exploring what Transformation 4.0 looks like in practice and where execution maturity really breaks down.

I’d genuinely value your perspective:

• Where do you see organizationsstruggling most with execution today?
• What feels harder now than it did evenfive years ago?
• And what do you believe true transformation maturity actually looks like?

If any of this resonates, I invite you to share your views. The best insights in transformation come from lived experience.

If you’d like to explore how organizations are operationalising Transformation 4.0 in practice, we’re happy to continue the conversation.

Continue the conversation